September 16, 2018

Accusations of recklessness or insufficient caring

This post is part of a series focused on political persuasion. Others in the series are linked from an introductory overview.

Much political messaging boils down to “They don’t care (enough)”.  Indeed, that theme is central to:

At the highest level, this is obvious.

As in so much else, debates about “caring” often hinge on credibility/confidence and/or importance.

More generally, claiming your opponent doesn’t care about something faces two inherent credibility challenges:

Accusations of cowardice or some lesser form of wimpyness sometimes get into the mix as well.

One of the earliest examples of this I recall was a recording of a 1952 Richard Nixon campaign speech, in which he said – in the context of McCarthyish anti-Communist warnings — that Adlai Stevenson’s “loyalty” was not to be questioned, but his “judgment” was.

Finally, an old joke seems too relevant to omit:

“What’s the difference between ignorance and apathy?”
“I don’t know and I don’t care.”

Related link

Comments

One Response to “Accusations of recklessness or insufficient caring”

  1. Patterns of political persuasion | Strategic Messaging on September 16th, 2018 3:12 am

    […] That’s spelled out in a post about accusations of recklessness or insufficient caring. […]

Leave a Reply




Feed including blog about strategic marketing and messaging in technology and politics Subscribe to the Monash Research feed via RSS or email:

Login

Search our blogs and white papers

Monash Research blogs

User consulting

Building a short list? Refining your strategic plan? We can help.

Vendor advisory

We tell vendors what's happening -- and, more important, what they should do about it.

Monash Research highlights

Learn about white papers, webcasts, and blog highlights, by RSS or email.